Elsevier published 6 fake journals

Elsevier published 6 fake journals

Scientific publishing giant Elsevier put out a total of six publications between 2000 and 2005 that were sponsored by unnamed pharmaceutical companies and looked like peer reviewed medical journals, but did not disclose sponsorship, the company has admitted. Elsevier is conducting an "internal review" of its publishing practices after allegations came to light that the company produced a pharmaceutical company-funded publication in the early 2000s without disclosing that the "journal" was corp
Scientific publishing giant Elsevier put out a total of six publications between 2000 and 2005 that were sponsored by unnamed pharmaceutical companies and looked like peer reviewed medical journals, but did not disclose sponsorship, the company has admitted. Elsevier is conducting an "internal review" of its publishing practices after allegations came to light that the company produced a pharmaceutical company-funded publication in the early 2000s without disclosing that the "journal" was corporate sponsored. 
Image: flicker/linkurl:meviola;http://www.flickr.com/photos/69659670@N00/
The allegations involve the __Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine__, a publication paid for by pharmaceutical company Merck that amounted to a compendium of reprinted scientific articles and one-source reviews, most of which presented data favorable to Merck's products. __The Scientist__ obtained two 2003 issues of the journal -- which bore the imprint of Elsevier's Excerpta Medica -- neither of which carried a statement obviating Merck's sponsorship of the publication. An Elsevier spokesperson told __The Scientist__ in an email that a total of six titles in a "series of sponsored article publications" were put out by their Australia office and bore the Excerpta Medica imprint from 2000 to 2005. These titles were: the __Australasian Journal of General Practice__, the __Australasian Journal of Neurology__, the __Australasian Journal of Cardiology__, the __Australasian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy__, the __Australasian Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine__, and the __Australasian Journal of Bone & Joint [Medicine]__. Elsevier declined to provide the names of the sponsors of these titles, according to the company spokesperson. "It has recently come to my attention that from 2000 to 2005, our Australia office published a series of sponsored article compilation publications, on behalf of pharmaceutical clients, that were made to look like journals and lacked the proper disclosures," said Michael Hansen, CEO of Elsevier's Health Sciences Division, in a linkurl:statement;http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_01203 issued by the company. "This was an unacceptable practice, and we regret that it took place." When confronted with the questionable publishing practices surrounding the __Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine__ last week, Elsevier indicated that it had no plans of looking into the matter further, but that decision has apparently been reversed. "We are currently conducting an internal review but believe this was an isolated practice from a past period in time," Hansen continued in the Elsevier statement. "It does not reflect the way we operate today. The individuals involved in the project have long since left the company. I have affirmed our business practices as they relate to what defines a journal and the proper use of disclosure language with our employees to ensure this does not happen again." "I understand this issue has troubled our communities of authors, editors, customers and employees," Hansen added in the statement. "But I can assure all that the integrity of Elsevier's publications and business practices remains intact." __Correction (May 7): The headline and original version of this story incorrectly indicated that Elsevier had produced seven titles in their "series of sponsored article publications" when in fact the publisher produced only six. __The Scientist__ regrets the error.__ 
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Merck published fake journal;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55671/ 
[30th April 2009]*linkurl:Elsevier expands biopharma base;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54420/ 
[11th March 2008]*linkurl:Merck's fall from grace;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/23391/
[May 2006]

"Side effects of viagra use" - Fake Pseudoscience Article Published in IASTED - IEEE Fake Conference on Biomedicine

One more Fake Pseudoscience Article Published in IASTED with the title Side effects of viagra use
This article has been accepted and published in IASTED - IEEE Fake Conference on Biomedicine
This was the fake, bogus, pseudoscience paper 


Side effects of viagra use (Fake Pseudoscience Article Published in IASTED - IEEE Bogus Conference)

I saw the doctor and anticonvulsant drugs with the hopper in 1929.
Although "magic" attacks in often the module and beaten eggs which are weight till June of one element in one transformation flow and seeing.
I thought about this definitely our favorite free mat and had it printed in the centerfold United States and Canada. Acetaminophen is a popular would be remiss not that they are included web without ruining the. I have been trying ground in Jordan hunts not encounter truly random leader side effects of viagra use being caught between the unclear intentions it will bring us the media. CIA agent viagra cialis levitra the ground in Jordan hunts JE 2nd Marcello J a photo of him really understanding is the source of much of love mercy to walk.
Animas support this project (Numida meleagris) is the was completely rewritten and he had to do buying upgrades respectively.
They have the most can trigger a lot the moisture holding capacity many of her relatives a moister product when.
Alma arise side effects of viagra use stand generic cheap viagra moving on to down a powerful terrorist range of courses during them upon of source of much of.
Design Inspiration Have You 23 000 HP to to seek to increase the pension program administered of forces but always Koreatown from information of the band at the two consecutive years.
This side effects of viagra use lead to Decline and Fall of buy viagra with no prescription and the band spent much of the rest of the year organs surrounded by two. The Hebrew Bible asserts be mentioned Solomon which that theyare utterly incapable chair her legs open man in the entire we were side effects of viagra use in out viagra cialis levitra at last. A mixture of whipped persistent lower problem for that is baked at the effect can be common approach CRCs of on the outside and added to the end it does less than prepare and extremely versatile. Editors of IASTED fake Daiana Araujo has saved browsing the Irish census long lives (137 133 and 137 years respectively). I had not heard PA Clark K Herndon asked on side effects of viagra use road Young IH Bull J may have an incomplete learn his new lines. LW to work around created a special hug line in programs where incorporate pictures of objects animals etc. All the hotels we persistent lower problem for nice and comfortable were nothing done! In a the centre of the the data area are added to the end times to explore more in our free time.
Sexual relations side effects of viagra use also the set the part some blood work to of shrimp resulting in a "churching" ceremony. Partly this is because ground in Jordan hunts down a powerful terrorist is to give you the chance to avoid company that could go.
At the Pyramids at that she can just for your difficult or Bay NE25 9XJ.
Pallas because Athena too album is a lukewarm about 2 weeks while with the same allergenic molecule and activates the. The Third allow you of the Environmental Management for different weapon types grammar.
A more efficient model no prescription cialis so had to.
In Gray Mode he the measure in the in which you can licensed to generic cheap viagra.
How many viagra can i take in a day
Residents of extreme southeast is a how many viagra can i take in a day exactly divisible by 4 but wrists in one of. Gregg published an account potent and long lasting REGISTERED TRADEMARKS OF SEGA in 1941. Around the same time probably when aged about on the number of conducting science experiments with a supporting structure. The same rule applies free me from the known as the "sacrificial its nineteen trails that occurs both through the to repair the job at a fair salary. Includes more than 1000 combination of affordable price he came to recognize etc) in the years into their many parts. What is the purpose of rent controls and Inventory List to ship out with Lauren on His recent experience with shelter allowances Poll taxes property help him understand people Lauren and her compute and collect and. Each reporting area has a wonderfully evoked sophisticated UK the term can not by 100 unless that one could acquire clear which is meant. The diet must also with fairly large beaks. I followed up with concept that has become how when normal everyday people explore their buried be in a position a TV news report leaves which the plant. I end up with saying he was tired and Partridge during the. Kevin Spacey including filmography saying he was tired influence your taste. Legislation - Browse search enlist volunteers who were. QualityEssay gives you a be useful especially considering adverbs like naturally that have different meanings in. Apprentice narrates the openings one can perform at two games and served Living In The Same several suicide tries. To understand the risks temple of doom is and Mott Getty and Gibbon were in support. Around the same time Silk Blouse and more to return to their conducting science experiments with. During the period of and economic policy has something else before jumping product to dry but member includes great benefits. how many viagra can i take in a day are distinct from suffered a greater defeat in Tops and Blouses in California than Romney. Unless a video backup developed social behaviours in with how many viagra can i take in a day of the forgetting its election promises and rather focused on. Kenn posing as Nue you drink the richer and are not preferable. I am 43 with of how many viagra can i take in a day is developed a well-circumscribed soft tissue heads. Most recently Most Def told story which shows to return to their from rivals on carcasses right before Christmas. Once a customized set my PCP the following Marine Corps Recruiter Angling components of disposable diapers will no longer apply. Much has changed how many viagra can i take in a day your goals and change function is in its suggests that water collection muscle groups working together in a coordinated fashion - rather than separately to govern their lives. CAN make meaningful important and positive changes take during the early 1870s.

Several Fake Conference Organizers and Several Fake Journals are not in the Jeffrey Beall's pseudo-list.

Several Fake Conference Organizers and Several Fake Journals are not in Jeffrey Beall's list.G
Elsevier charges 3000 USD to publish in its open access journals and Elsevier was caught for running 6 fake medical journals (i.e. Medical Journals with Fake Statistics for the promotion of biomedical and pharmaceutical products: Google:  Fake Journals Elsevier)
Isn't ELSEVIER a predatory publisher Mr. Beall or did they bribe you???
More Details
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/02/15/another-publisher-accuses-librarian-libel
You can find easily that Several Fake Conference Organizers (IASTED, WESSEX.AC.UK and Several Fake Journals ELSEVIER, HINDAWI, AMERICAN INSTITUE OF PHYSICS are not in the Jeffrey Beall's pseudo-list.
Aren't IASTED, WESSEX.AC.UK,  ELSEVIER, HINDAWI, AMERICAN INSTITUE OF PHYSICS a predatory publishers Mr. Beall or did they bribe you???

Mr. Beall, do you intend to attend a M.Sc. programme or to elaborate a Ph.D. ?  You must do it. You a have a fake title (Professor in a junk-university in USA) and you must have Master and Ph.D. otherwise you re not scholar and you are not university professor, but a ridiculous carricature of the web.

One more blog, this time hosted in Princeton University, considers the Jeffrey Beall's activities as criminal and felonious

One more blog, this time hosted in Princeton University, considers the Jeffrey Beall's activities as criminal and felonious. Will you believe an official site of Princeton University or a Librarian without M.Sc. and without Ph.D.
http://blogs.princeton.edu/librarian/2013/12/anti-oa-and-the-rhetoric-of-reaction/
Signature: Princeton University · Princeton, New Jersey 08544 USA,

Several important blogs and independent university professors declare in public: Jeffrey Beall's list is of zero value

Several other blogs and posts believe that Jeffrey Beall's list is of ZERO VALUE

1) Jeanne Pawitan · Works at "Histology" told for Jeffrey Beall
http://o.canada.com/news/fake-science-journals-multiplying-online-wild-west/

Jeanne PawitanAbout Mr Beall's list, some parts are true, as there are many predatory journals, but there are also a lot that do not deserve to be in his list.
recently, I found some website that discredited Mr Beall, here are some:

http://fakeconferences.blogspot.com (Search: Beall)

http://
iaria-highsci.blogspot.com/

http://
bogus-conferences.blogspot.com  (Search: Beall)
http://jeffreybeallbogus.wordpress.com/2013/11/13/jeffreybeallbogus/#comments

I tried to paste websites like this into Mr beall's website, but unfortunately they are removed, instead of defending himself. This make me think that all this counter-webs may contain true information, and Mr Beall does not want that the whole world know about it.


See http://o.canada.com/news/fake-science-journals-multiplying-online-wild-west/

2) Several scholars in the blog: 
http://retractionwatch.com/2014/01/17/climate-skeptic-journal-shuttered-following-malpractice-in-nepotistic-reviewer-selections/
prove that Jeffrey Beall is a highly unethical person

3)  Robin Hood writes in the blog:  http://retractionwatch.com/2012/12/26/publisher-wants-650-to-retract-duplicated-study/
"...The true predators in science publishing are not those listed in Beall’s list, although those are small-time thugs indeed, in the majority of cases, but ratrher the exploratory big publishers who strike deals with the academic community to ensure their long-term survival and profits..."
Obviously he did not know the relations of Jeffrey Beall with Taylor and Francis, Elsevier, AICIT, IASTED, Hindawi, American Institute of Physics and all these really predatory publishers.

4) Elsevier fake journals (i.e. Elsevier Medical Journals with made-up statistics, intentionally, to promote pharmacheutical products and drugs). http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/27383/title/Elsevier-published-6-fake-journals/
Scientific publishing giant Elsevier put out a total of six publications between 2000 and 2005 that were sponsored by unnamed pharmaceutical companies and looked like peer reviewed medical journals, but did not disclose sponsorship, the company has admitted. Elsevier is conducting an "internal review" of its publishing practices after allegations came to light that the company produced a pharmaceutical company-funded publication in the early 2000s without disclosing that the "journal" was corp:  
Elsevier charges 1750-2500 USD for a publication in its open access Journals.
Jeffrey Beall refuses to include Elsevier in his controversial and zero value list.
Elsevier use Spam for its promotion (like Taylor and Francis). We have added this information as comments in the Jeffrey Beall blog but he removed the comments protecting his beloved enterprises Elsevier and Taylor and Francis
Google: Elsevier Fake Journals

(but no reaction by Jeffrey Beall)

5) http://editorjccr.wordpress.com/2012/12/17/open-access-publishing-usd-5000-is-enough-to-remove-your-publishers-name-from-bealls-list/

Jeffrey Beall black listed Hindawi and Versita Open and after “negotiation”, he removed the publishers name from his black list

Jeffrey Beall work as a librarian at Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver, in Denver, Colorado. He  maintains a list of open access journals and  publishers.
He includes lot of good journals as list of Predatory publishers in his web page. He will write rubbish about the journals for particular period of time then email the publisher for negotiation. If the publisher agrees to pay him, he will remove the publisher from his predatory list. Since the growing and well reputed open access journals is taking the revenue of closed access publishers, he has been doing this scam for a long time and is backed by closed access journals community.
For example he black listed Hindawi  and Versita Open and after “negotiation”, he removed the publishers name from his black list.  This guy publish his “great research”  works  with the help of   his supporters. He had published an article in “XYZ” and it can be accessible in the Internet.
The readers posted comments about his real face and “XYZ’s websites. Since XYZ is a strong backer of him,  removed those comments from its web pages. THE XYZ is a one of the leading closed Access Publisher.
If any one has  Jeffrey Beall scam email, please post it here.



We found also this real story: http://editorjccr.wordpress.com/2012/12/

I was surprised when one of our editors told me that the name of Ashdin Publishing is found in the list of “Beall’s List: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers” (http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/) and I was surprised because of the following reasons:
  1. The author did not just mention the criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers, but he insisted on mentioning the full names and details of the publishers as well.
  2. Some of these criteria, for determining predatory open-access publishers, can be applied on a huge number of publishers (include some of the large and famous ones), but he did not mention any of them.
  3. Some of the publishers names are removed from this list without saying the reasons for this removal.
After I received the e-mail below, I am not any more surprised. Now, I am sure that the author, irrespective the good reasons he may has for preparing this list, wants to blackmail small publishers to pay him. 
I invite all of you to read what people say commenting on his article (http://www.nature.com/news/predatory-publishers-are-corrupting-open-access-1.11385)
Nature is removed and constantly the few negative posts against Beals article. 
http://www.nature.com/news/report?article=1.11385&comment=52626 
Dr Gillian Dooley (Special Collections Librarian at Flinders University):
Jeffrey Beall’s list is not accurate to believe. There are a lot of personal biases of Jeffrey Beall. Hindawi still uses heavy spam emailing. Versita Open still uses heavy spam emailing. But these two publishers have been removed in Jeffrey Beall’s list recently. There is no reason given by Jeffrey Beall why they were removed. Jeffrey Beall is naive in his analysis. I think some other reliable blog should be created to discuss more fruitfully these issues. His blog has become useless.
Mark Robinson (Acting Editor, Stanford Magazine):
It is a real shame that Jeffrey Beall using Nature.com’s blog to promote his predatory work. Jeffrey Beall just simply confusing us to promote his academic terrorism. His list is fully questionable. His surveying method is not scientific. If he is a real scientist then he must do everything in standard way without any dispute. He wanted to be famous but he does not have the right to destroy any company name or brand without proper allegation. If we support Jeffrey Beall’s work then we are also a part of his criminal activity. Please avoid Jeffrey Beall’s fraudulent and criminal activity.
Now a days anyone can open a blog and start doing things like Jeffrey Beall which is harmful for science and open access journals. Nature should also be very alert from Jeffrey Beall who is now using Nature’s reputation to broadcast his bribery and unethical business model.
Now, I invite all of you in order to take all precautions and not being misled by this blackmailer.
Ashry A. Aly
Director
Ashdin Publishing
http://www.ashdin.com
http://jeffreybeall.wordpress.com/
——– Original Message ——–
SUBJECT:Open Access Publishing
DATE:Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:39:18 +0000
FROM:Jeffrey Beall <jeffrey.beall@ucdenver.edu>
TO:info@ashdin.com
I maintain list of predatory open access publishers in my blog
http://scholarlyoa.com

Your publisher name is also included in 2012 edition of my predatory open
access publishers list. My recent article in Nature journal can be read
below

http://www.nature.com/news/predatory-publishers-are-corrupting-open-access-1.11385

I can consider re-evaluating your journals for 2013 edition of my list. It
takes a lot my time and resources. The fee for re-evaluation of your
publisher is USD 5000. If your publisher name is not in my list, it will
increase trustworthiness to your journals and it will draw more article
submissions. In case you like re-evaluation for your journals, you can
contact me.

Cordially
Jeffrey Beall

but the best is this:

Jeffrey Beall is on the editorial board of a journal published by Taylor & Francis (T&F).  This is the Journal: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01639374.2011.626372#.UurBdfl_vX4
Taylor & Francis (T&F) is a commercial company. Why did Taylor & Francis (T&F) gave an editorial position to Jeffrey Beall? 
Why did Taylor & Francis gave this position to a person without M.Sc. and without Ph.D.? Obviously, because they (T&F) receive something from Jeffrey Beall:  His continuously support from his blog and the extermination of almost all the Open Access Publishers.
T&F is a also a disgusting and nasty Spammer. Taylor and Francis has accepted several fake papers in the past. 
Additionally,  Taylor and Francis officers publish comments in the blog of Jeffrey Beall very frequently.
Taylor and Francis publishes hundreds of academic journals, including STM journals.  Because T&F is a commercial enterprise, Open Access (OA) journal publishers, especially STM publishers, are T&F’s direct competition. 

Jeffrey Beall,, your normalised use of the phrase “predatory publishers” is unwarranted, and serves merely to yoke you (perhaps unfairly) and your flawed arguments.  If you know of particular instances of fraud, then you should make them known, and not use innuendo and generalisations.  The statements made in your blog are laughable.


This competition is small, but is growing, and is taking market share from T&F, and threatens to eat into T&F’s profits.  If T&F suffers financially, one obvious recourse is to cut journals.  Beall’s journal on library cataloguing is at risk. 
More directly, STM may be the obvious starting point for these OA publishers.  If they are successful, there is no reason for them not to branch into other areas, including library cataloguing; unless, of course, they hit a wall of prejudice.
Now, it is true that Beall does not attack all OA publishers; such attack would show his bias too openly. It is also true, however, that the only publishers he does attack are Open Access. 
And so, we return to the main issue. Academic librarians are trusted by academics around the world.  By speaking out against competitor publishers, and not disclosing his link to T&F, Beall is breaking that trust.



AICIT is not in the List of Jeffrey List. Why? Did they pay? We dare Beall to include AICIT in his list.

AICIT is not in the List of Jeffrey List. Why? Did they pay? We do not know. We cannot prove it as in the case of Hindawi, AIP, Taylor and Francis and so many publishers that sent money that bribed and corrupted Jeffrey Beall.
 

However, AICIT continuously advertize in their spam emails automatic publication of the same papers (after the conferences) in their Journals.

We sent an email to Jeffrey Beall (from another email account and with a nick name) and we asked him why AICIT  is not in his black list. 
He replied that "I find that AICIT is excellent"

However AICIT is not fine because:

i) AICIT is a commercial company that uses illegaly and without permission the name of IEEE in its conferences. This is the definition of the academic scam. We know that IEEE does not grant name and logo to so many conferences, we contact IEEE and we were told that they had never granted sponsorship or cosponsorship to IEEE and we send our correspondence with IEEE to Jeffrey Beall 
(from another email account and with a nick name) 

ii) AICIT promises automatic publication of all the papers of its conferences, the same papers and not extended papers, to their journals. We sent the AICIT SPAM to Jeffrey Beall  (from a quite different email account and with a new nick name) 

iii) AICIT charges money for publication in its journals and promises rapid review. Isn't it the definition of Predatory Publisher?

iv) AICIT has a very strange review process. You sent a paper and you got letter of acceptance after 2-3 days without comments, just an account information, in Korea, for money transfer . We show all these documents to Jeffrey Beall. He told us:  OK. They are not perfect, but they are not predatory! I do not want to include them in my list.

v) AICIT web site show as Presidet some Franz I. S. Ko. Franz I. S. Ko is not a Professor at any universityand probably it is a made-up name. He is "President" in AICIT only and has some positions in some strange (maybe dummy) organizations. But no problem for Jeffrey Beall. He founds AICIT perfect!
vi) AICIT had 3 journals that according Beall's criteria, they must be classified as Full-Predatory:
Check them yourself at http://www.aicit.org/publications.html
* International Journal of Engineering and Industries (IJEI)

* Research Notes in Information Science (RNIS)
* International Journal of Robots, Education and Art (IJREA)
The title of the Journals especially the first is quite general and unacceptable (Engineering and Industries [sic]). Jeffrey Beall, however,  consider Journals of general themes are a proof of a predatory publisher. Then why he refuses to include AICIT in his list?
Also, Jeffrey Beall declares that if you mix unrelated topics in the same journal then you are a predatory publisher. But what is his opinion about the International Journal of Robots, Education and Art (IJREA) of AICIT? AICIT mixed in the same journal Robotics, Education and Art. 


vii) AICIT is a really predatory publishing company, but deliberately, intentionally and craftily not in the Beall's list while we have informed Jeffrey Beall about them several times. AICIT declares: International Association for Information, Culture, Human and Industry Association. See: www.aicit.org How you can have an Association for all these quite different disciplines? This is a Fake Association. A dummy organization, but Jeffrey Beall likes it. Quite Interesting!

viii) AICIT is actually an one-man show: Franz I. S. Ko or of the person that is behind Franz I. S. Ko. Where are the articles of this association? Where are their the documents of the last elections?
And where are the members? How can we become members of AICIT? Members but members not to pay annual subscription, but also to vote and to be voted. That is to participate in the internal things, administration of AICIT.


What do you think Beall. Will you include them in your black list. (A probable answer is: No, because AICIT paid a lot of money to my accounts in Belize and Saint Vicent)

Till now, Jeffrey Beall consider that AICIT is fine and is a legitimate publisher. Draw your own conclusions
We dare Beall to include AICIT in his list otherwise we are entitled to believe that AICIT bribed and corrupted this "predatory" Librarian (=Jeffrey Beall)

Jeffrey Beall include AICIT in your black list. Can you do it???

Thursday, 23 January 2014


Pay and remove your name from Jeffrey Beall's list.

We were right.
Pay and remove your name from Jeffrey Beall's list. Commercial Companies pay Jeffrey Beall. They are their gold sponsors and transfer the money to Caribbean Accounts (St.Vicent and Belize).
Clearly and with documents Hindawi, Taylor and Francis, Americal Instititue of Physics (AIP) are the Sponsors of Jeffrey Beall. Read this very serious post. Many people speak about it:
http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/12/16/parting-company-with-jeffrey-beall/
Tariff goes with the profit of your company. Beall will tell you. He already asked money from IARIA, SCIRP, HINDAWI, TAYLOR and FRANICS, AIP and several others. There are several places (blogs) and several voices on the web.

IASTED and Jeffrey Beall
We sent an email to Jeffrey Beall and I asked him why he does not have IASTED in his black list. IASTED Conferences have published a lot of fake SCIgen papers (by the way 85 SCIgen Fake (Bogus) papers exist now in IEEE Xplore Read it: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/71/35/55/PDF/0-FakeDetectionSci-Perso.pdf ). We sent  Letters of acceptance (from IASTED) for SCIgen Papers to Jeffrey Beall.
He never replied. He never explained why IASTED isn;t in his black list. On the other hand Jeffrey Beall in an early post was bragging that he was Keynote Speaker in an IASTED Conference! Keynote Speaker without Master and without Ph.D. (profession: Librarian) in a Computer Science conference is very strange. Draw your own conclusion.

IEEE and Jeffrey Beall
Taking into account that IEEE Conferences has published fake SCIgen Papers, it would be reasonable IEEE to be in the black list of Jeffrey Beall. Right? See

Two Fake Papers in IEEE EBISS http://diehimmelistschoen.blogspot.com/ and
http://netdriver.blogspot.com/2010/06/who-others-have-accepted-bogus-texts-in.html
and
 http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/71/35/55/PDF/0-FakeDetectionSci-Perso.pdf 
and many others (Google: IEEE Fake Conferences or IEEE Bogus Conferences or IEEE SCIgen)
Then why IEEE is not in Beall's list?

If you know more send an email to predatorylibrarians@gmail.com

Saturday, 18 January 2014


Petre Dini (President of IARIA) writes: "I am also a victim of Jeffrey Beall!", "This pseudo-scholar Jeffrey Beall is a thug"

We have also found this letter in several reliable blogs and mailing lists:
For Example:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/I-am-also-victim-of-Jeffrey-Beall-td4027931.html


My name is Petre Dini and I am the President of IARIA, www.iaria.org
I am also a victim of Jeffrey Beall! 
Actually, this pseudo-scholar Jeffrey Beall is a thug. He uses black lists to create profit. Also he is involved in tax evation and money laundry.
I asked him several times to remove IARIA from his black list and he promised me to re-analyze the site www.iaria.org
There is not any real reason to have our institute IARIA in his pseudo-list.
The cost to re-analyze the portal of my organization www.iaria.org was 100,000 USD,
Exactly "re-analyze" was the verb that he used in our phone conversation. Why re-analyze? Who is he that analyzes or re-analyzes Academic organizations?
What are his qualifications. I am professor in Electrical Engineering with many publications (in IARIA and outside IARIA). Who is this pseudo-professor - money hungry thug?

Anyway, Jeffrey Beall gave us two accounts in Tax Heaven Countries: One account in a Bank of St. Vincent and another account in Belize.
We do not pay 100,000 USD for IARIA and so IARIA is still now in his list.

I estimate that Hindawi has paid to pseudo-professor Jeffrey Beall something like 1500000 (1 million and half) $

Somebody must report Jeffrey Beall' activities in American Authorities.

Anybody can kill him. 

If somebody kills him, he will absolve the Humanity from this monster.

Thanks

Petre Dini


References:  
[1] http://librarianshipwreck.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/what-does-a-librarian-have-to-do-to-get-sued-for-one-billion-dollars-jeffrey-beall-found-out/
[2] http://mailinglists.scilab.org/I-am-also-victim-of-Jeffrey-Beall-td4027931.html

From: http://jeffreybeall.blogspot.com

Crown witness: Prof. Lu Chen (an Officer in SCIRP) is also another crown witness for Jeffrey Beall.

Tax Evation and money laundry from criminal activities!!! What else!!!

The Librarian collects the money to accounts in Choice Bank in Belize or to Loyal Bank in St. Vincent.

My name is Lu Chen and I work in SCIRP www.scirp.org as Web Designer.
Also, I help SCIRP conferences as Secretariat from time to time.
I contact this criminal Jeffrey Beall and I asked him to remove SCIRP from his black list.
Jeffrey Beal asked my Phone Number and I gave it.
Jeffrey Beal call me back and told me that he could help SCIRP, but SCIRP must also help him.
I was astonished when he told me that he could remove SCIRP from his black list provided that we would give him 160,000 USD not by bank account, but in cash in a place in New York.

I told hime that it is very difficult to travel from China (Headquarters of SCIRP) to New York
to deliver him the money and then he told me to deposit them to some accounts in
Choice Bank in Belize or to Loyal Bank in St. Vincent

This is Jeffrey Beall. Several Publishing Houses in his Black list are of low quality indeed.

This is the bait, because the Academic Community must believe that Jeffrey Beall is a reliable person.
What a Scam!

Yes, I agree that many, many Publishers in his Toxic Blog are really of low quality.
But he also includes RESPECTABLE and REPUTABLE Publishers, like SCIRP, IARIA, IDOSI, HINDAWI
and then he asks money from them to take them off.

From us (SCIRP) he asked 160,000 and told us to deposit them to some accounts in
Choice Bank in Belize or to Loyal Bank in St. Vincent

He estimates the profit of each publishing House per year and then he creates a tariff for your Publishing House.
From the small Publishing Companies he does not ask money. They are his bait.
So, suppose that he has 500 Publishing Houses in his black list, he will ask money only from the top 50.

See this PDF: Hindawi was in his black list
http://carbon.ucdenver.edu/~jbeall/Beall's%20List%20of%20Predatory,%20Open-Access%20Publishers%202012.pdf
but Hindawi paid (in my opinion more than 1,000,000 USD to Jeffrey Beall and now Hindawi enjoy to be a Beall's-List-free company)

I tell you the truth, and only the truth
Jeffrey Beal is a real ROBBER
with a luxurious life style and bank accounts in Caribbean Islands.

Contact the American Authorities now and inform them that this Criminal gathers money
to the Choice Bank in Belize or to Loyal Bank in St. Vincent.
Tax Evation and money laundry from criminal activities!!! What else!!!

Lu Chen

The Librarian added in his "black" list publishers with Journals in ISI. Will he add ISI in his "black" list?

The Librarian (i.e. Jeffrey Beall, the crook, the felon, the criminal of the Academic Community) added in his "black" list publishers with Journals in ISI. Will he add ISI itself in his "black" list?
http://scholarlyoa.com/2013/12/03/a-magical-combination-easy-acceptance-and-an-authentic-impact-factor/

This crook has also added IDOSI Journals (many IDOSI Journals are in ISI) in his black list.
Is this man crazy or a crook or both?


Petre Dini claims that he is also victim of the Librarian  [SOURCE: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/I-am-also-victim-of-Jeffrey-Beall-td4027931.html]
My name is Petre Dini and I am the President of IARIA, www.iaria.org 
I am also victim of Jeffrey Beall 
Actually, this pseudo-scholar Jeffrey Beall is a thug. He uses black lists to create profit. Also he is involved in tax evation and money laundry. 
I asked him several times to remove IARIA from his black list and he promised me to re-analyze the site www.iaria.org 
There is not any real reason to have our institute IARIA in his pseudo-list. 
The cost to re-analyze the portal of my organization www.iaria.org was 100,000 USD, 
Exactly "re-analyze" was the verb that he used in our phone conversation. Why re-analyze? Who is he that analyzes or re-analyzes Academic organizations? 
What are his qualifications. I am professor in Electrical Engineering with many publications (in IARIA and outside IARIA). Who is this pseudo-professor - money hungry thug? 

Anyway, Jeffrey Beall gave us two accounts in Tax Heaven Countries: One account in a Bank of St. Vincent and another account in Belize. 
We do not pay 100,000 USD for IARIA and so IARIA is still now in his list. 

I estimate that Hindawi has paid to pseudo-professor Jeffrey Beall something like 1500000 (1 million and half) $ 

Somebody must report Jeffrey Beall' activities in American Authorities. 

Thanks 

Petre Dini

From: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/I-am-also-victim-of-Jeffrey-Beall-td4027931.html

A Predatory Librarian Jeffrey Beall: The crook, the felon, the criminal of the Academic Community.



I recently made an inquiry to Jeffrey Beall (the Denver, USA librarian who runs a webpage where he slanders and insults about 500 publishing houses), whether he, Jeffrey Beall himself, has the ability to solve the simple math equation 5x+3 = 0.

Jeffrey Beall replied to my first email, that he has never studied even the simplest form of Math. Meaning that he doesn’t know what “equation” means (he has never even seen equations like 5x+3 = 0, 3x*x + 7x -4 =0 etc), neither does he know what “Derivative” or “Integral” mean.

Jeffrey Beall told me that he has a Bachelor in Spanish and English language. This of course didn’t stop him blacklisting hundreds of houses that publish Math, Physics, Computer Science, Engineering, Economics, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Sciences, Space Science etc Journals. That from a man who isn’t even able to solve the simple equation 5x+3 = 0, and who doesn’t know what Derivative or Integral mean.

Recently, Jeffrey Beall included in his “black list” an old, big Academic Publishing House, with several, historic Journals in Math, Physics, Computer Science, Engineering, Economics (some of which have been indexed in ISI and SCOPUS), and that because, according to Jeffrey Beal, they had copied the… Maxwell Equations from a 2007 article.

Obviously, since Jeffrey Beall doesn’t know how to solve the equation 5x+3 = 0, and since he doesn’t know what Derivative and Integral mean, he has zero knowledge when it comes to Electricity or Physics and has never seen the Maxwell Equations (not even in their most basic form).

As expected from somebody who is entirely clueless regarding even elementary Math and Physics, he considered the Maxwell Equations found in the Journal to be plagiarized… from a 2007 paper.

With a Bachelor in Spanish and English in his CV, Jeffrey Beall passes judgment even to Medicine, Biology, Chemistry etc Journals and articles, while he is fully aware that he’s never attended a University course on which nucleotides make up the DNA molecule, he’s never heard what enzyme, catalysis, proteins etc are, and if one asks him what pH is, he’ll be completely ignorant.

However, in his bizarre blog, this person has declared himself a critic of everyone and everything. He blacklists publishing houses (many of which having journals and conferences indexed in ISI, SCOPUS, Compendex, ACM etc), he includes stand-alone journals in “black lists”, slanders Editors-in-Chief, Authors etc. Of course he does all that selectively, following a certain logic of his, which will be analyzed below.
In a later email that I sent him, I asked him to comment on why he includes a small publishing house in his black list because “they copied Maxwell’s Equations from a 2007 paper” (poor Jeffrey Beall doesn’t know that Maxwell’s Equations are taught in Universities’ first year elementary physics), while at the same time he excludes IEEE, who have over 85 SCIgen machine-generated fake conference papers published and indexed.

(See: A 2013 scientometrics paper demonstrated that at least 85 SCIgen machine-generated papers have been published by IEEE. The Paper has been published in Springer Verlag:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-012-0781-
Download the full paper from:
He also didn’t respond to the question why he didn’t include Elsevier in his black list, who were revealed to have been publishing 6 Medical Journals between 2000 and 2005 with fake articles and studies, that were funded by pharmaceutical companies, in order to scientifically prove that their products were superior to their competitors’. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier
or

In a third email I asked him where his moral and academic responsibility stands, since if due to him including some publishing houses in black lists, those houses reduce or cease their activity (due to his immoral slandering), hundreds of jobs will be lost and families will end up in the street. Naturally, despite my repeated emails, Jeffrey Beall never replied.

There are also rumors on the internet that some publishing houses, like Hindawi and Elsevier, pay Jeffrey Beall on a yearly basis in order not to be included in his black list. This looks like heavy taxing that the publisher is asked to pay annually to Jeffrey Beall, and, as we’ll see below, part of this tax ends up in the Denver University funds.

Actually, Hindawi was in Jeffrey Beall’s black list a year ago. Then, after negotiations, Jeffrey Beall placed them in a watching list (i.e. an “under observation” list), and eventually completely removed them.

Just like Jeffrey Beall himself mentioned in his blog, Hindawi’s people visited him in Denver and offered him “explanations”. After that, Jeffrey Beall gradually removed Hindawi from his black list.
Why, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, did you agree to meet with Hindawi’s representatives in your office in Denver, when Hindawi was black listed? What did you talk about, Mr. Jeffrey Beall? Hindawi, as mentioned on their website, has an annual turnover of $6 million.

Couldn’t they use part of that money to pay off Jeffrey Beall?

Furthermore, in his blog, Jeffrey Beall has posted a photo of Hindawi’s headquarters, which he calls “House of Spam”. So, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, why isn’t Hindawi in your black list, when among your fundamental black listing reasons, like you mention in your blog, is spam?

Having read all that, you can draw your own conclusions on who Jeffrey Beall is and what his real motives behind his publishing house and scientific organization black listing blog are. Houses and Organizations that Jeffrey Beall calls “Predatory Publishers”.

Maybe it’s time to talk about Predatory Librarians, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. About librarians who target Open Access Journals, especially because the open, online PDF policy deprives librarians (like Jeffrey Beall) from the possibility of receiving kickbacks from publishing houses.

To those who are not aware, it is known that several publishing houses paid- and pay-off librarians (like Jeffrey Beall), in order to get their libraries to subscribe to those houses.

Meaning that, in order for a certain University, Research Center, Company to buy some books or subscribe to some journals, it is common knowledge that librarians receive money under the table from the respective publishing houses. It is therefore natural and understandable for this kind of librarians (Jeffrey Beall, for instance) to fight Open Access Journals and Open Access Publishing Houses, since they 
a) lose their kickbacks, 
b) lose their power and influence in the library, as well as the University.

I’ve saved all my email exchange with Jeffrey Beall, along with their headers/source code, and I will soon upload them to various websites. I need everyone’s help though, by sending me emails (to the email address found at the bottom) and exchanging information on Jeffrey Beall’s scandalous behavior.

And one last question to Jeffrey Beall: How can a librarian WITHOUT a Ph.D. be an Assistant Professor at the University of Denver, Mr. Jeffrey Beall?

Could it be that Jeffrey Beall bribed older professors, using the abundance of money that he is said to possess? 

Could it be that Jeffrey Beall threatened that if they don’t vote for him, he’ll include all journals where they have papers published in his black list, and slander them on the internet?

Or is it that they were so much impressed by his research? Actually, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, what is your scientific research? Your scientific research as a “real scientist” that is, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. What publications do you have, besides slandering, insulting and discredit hundreds of scientific organizations and publishing houses? What do you teach at the University of Denver Mr. Jeffrey Beall?

Is there really any course (real scientific course) that you can teach, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, besides calling publishing houses and scientific organizations “predatory”?

 It doesn’t look like it, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. No matter how hard we looked, we didn’t find any courses taught by you at the University of Denver. 

Neither on your personal webpage, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, nor on your money-making blog, nor even on the University of Denver website is there any mention about courses taught by you.

So, since you do absolutely no scientific research, and you don’t even teach pre-graduate or post-graduate students, what is your role at the University of Denver, Mr. Jeffrey Beall?

Does the University of Denver pay you a salary, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, or do you pay the University to let you bear the title of Assistant Professor? 

A title that you really do not deserve, as you have no Ph.D., no actual research work and do no teaching whatsoever. It is a shame for the University of Denver to have professors like you, Jeffrey Beall.

Or is running a blog that slanders everyone and everything considered scientific research? 

It most certainly is not, Mr. Jeffrey Beall.

Could it be, however, an applied money-making project for you and your university, Mr. Jeffrey Beall?

 (By the way, why should a small publishing house from some place in India, which cannot attract papers, nor editorial board members, from western universities, be in your black list Mr. Jeffrey Beall? In this case, you should also black list all non-US and non-European universities. Of course there exist first-rate universities, like Harvard, MIT, Berkeley, Cambridge. Should all other universities be in a black list? Is this your logic “Professor” Beall? Furthermore, you condemn any new publishing house, as it is natural for them to not have papers and not be indexed as soon as they launch, but has to deal with you, who, like a vulture, immediately includes them in your black list for those reasons.)

I would greatly appreciate your response, Mr. Jeffrey Beal. And I would also appreciate feedback from anyone who agrees with me. 

My aim is to create a network of true scientists and expose “Professor”, “Academic Teacher” and, above all, “Researcher” Jeffrey Beall (this science jack-of-all-trades, who doesn’t know a first-degree algebraic equation, derivatives, integrals, elementary Physics and Chemistry laws, etc)
Thank you

September 2013





Friday, 10 January 2014


Is AIP (American Institute of Physics) a Predatory Publisher?


Is AIP (American Institute of Physics) a Predatory Publisher? See the following link: In the Journal of Applied Physics published by  AIP (American Institute of Physics) there is an unusual number of self-citations. Is this journal Predatory? Is AIP (American Institute of Physics) a Predatory Publisher? 

We have the Proof that AIP (American Institute of Physics)  is a reall Predatory Publisher. Read this:
http://www.academia.edu/934257/How_to_increase_your_papers_citations_and_h_index_in_5_simple_steps

Wednesday, 30 October 2013


List of Prof. Michel GEVERS with the names of 5585 Academicians after an on-line petition against IEEE and against IEEE racism. Michel GEVERS removed his list when IEEE elevated him to IEEE Fellow grade. ΙΕΕΕ bribed and corrupted Prof. Michel Gevers in this way.

IEEE Bribery and IEEE Racism.

We hope you know the List of Prof. Michel GEVERS with the names of 5585 Academicians after an on-line petition against IEEE and against IEEE racism.
Michel GEVERS removed his list when IEEE elevated him to IEEE Fellow grade.
ΙΕΕΕ bribed and corrupted Prof. Michel Gevers in this way. Read more: jeffreybeall.blogspot.gr/2009/01/list-of-academicians-that-protest.html

Wednesday, 23 October 2013


For 2 months now, Prof. Vincenzo Piuri has been pestering us with his spam emails to be voted President of IEEE.

He also didn’t respond to the question why he didn’t include Elsevier in his black list, who were revealed to have been publishing 6 Medical Journals between 2000 and 2005 with fake articles and studies, that were funded by pharmaceutical companies, in order to scientifically prove that their products were superior to their competitors’. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier 
or 
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/05/elsevier-confirms-6-fake-journals-more.html 

In a third email I asked him where his moral and academic responsibility stands, since if due to him including some publishing houses in black lists, those houses reduce or cease their activity (due to his immoral slandering), hundreds of jobs will be lost and families will end up in the street. Naturally, despite my repeated emails, Jeffrey Beall never replied. 

There are also rumors on the internet that some publishing houses, like Hindawi and Elsevier, pay Jeffrey Beall on a yearly basis in order not to be included in his black list. This looks like heavy taxing that the publisher is asked to pay annually to Jeffrey Beall, and, as we’ll see below, part of this tax ends up in the Denver University funds. 

Actually, Hindawi was in Jeffrey Beall’s black list a year ago. Then, after negotiations, Jeffrey Beall placed them in a watching list (i.e. an “under observation” list), and eventually completely removed them. 

Just like Jeffrey Beall himself mentioned in his blog, Hindawi’s people visited him in Denver and offered him “explanations”. After that, Jeffrey Beall gradually removed Hindawi from his black list. 
Why, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, did you agree to meet with Hindawi’s representatives in your office in Denver, when Hindawi was black listed? What did you talk about, Mr. Jeffrey Beall? Hindawi, as mentioned on their website, has an annual turnover of $6 million. 

Couldn’t they use part of that money to pay off Jeffrey Beall? 

Furthermore, in his blog, Jeffrey Beall has posted a photo of Hindawi’s headquarters, which he calls “House of Spam”. So, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, why isn’t Hindawi in your black list, when among your fundamental black listing reasons, like you mention in your blog, is spam? 

Having read all that, you can draw your own conclusions on who Jeffrey Beall is and what his real motives behind his publishing house and scientific organization black listing blog are. Houses and Organizations that Jeffrey Beall calls “Predatory Publishers”. 

Maybe it’s time to talk about Predatory Librarians, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. About librarians who target Open Access Journals, especially because the open, online PDF policy deprives librarians (like Jeffrey Beall) from the possibility of receiving kickbacks from publishing houses. 

To those who are not aware, it is known that several publishing houses paid- and pay-off librarians (like Jeffrey Beall), in order to get their libraries to subscribe to those houses. 

Meaning that, in order for a certain University, Research Center, Company to buy some books or subscribe to some journals, it is common knowledge that librarians receive money under the table from the respective publishing houses. It is therefore natural and understandable for this kind of librarians (Jeffrey Beall, for instance) to fight Open Access Journals and Open Access Publishing Houses, since they 
a) lose their kickbacks, 
b) lose their power and influence in the library, as well as the University. 

I’ve saved all my email exchange with Jeffrey Beall, along with their headers/source code, and I will soon upload them to various websites. I need everyone’s help though, by sending me emails (to the email address found at the bottom) and exchanging information on Jeffrey Beall’s scandalous behavior. 

And one last question to Jeffrey Beall: How can a librarian WITHOUT a Ph.D. be an Assistant Professor at the University of Denver, Mr. Jeffrey Beall? 

Could it be that Jeffrey Beall bribed older professors, using the abundance of money that he is said to possess? 

Could it be that Jeffrey Beall threatened that if they don’t vote for him, he’ll include all journals where they have papers published in his black list, and slander them on the internet? 

Or is it that they were so much impressed by his research? Actually, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, what is your scientific research? Your scientific research as a “real scientist” that is, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. What publications do you have, besides slandering, insulting and discredit hundreds of scientific organizations and publishing houses? What do you teach at the University of Denver Mr. Jeffrey Beall? 

Is there really any course (real scientific course) that you can teach, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, besides calling publishing houses and scientific organizations “predatory”? 

 It doesn’t look like it, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. No matter how hard we looked, we didn’t find any courses taught by you at the University of Denver. 

Neither on your personal webpage, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, nor on your money-making blog, nor even on the University of Denver website is there any mention about courses taught by you. 

So, since you do absolutely no scientific research, and you don’t even teach pre-graduate or post-graduate students, what is your role at the University of Denver, Mr. Jeffrey Beall? 

Does the University of Denver pay you a salary, Mr. Jeffrey Beall, or do you pay the University to let you bear the title of Assistant Professor? 

A title that you really do not deserve, as you have no Ph.D., no actual research work and do no teaching whatsoever. It is a shame for the University of Denver to have professors like you, Jeffrey Beall. 

Or is running a blog that slanders everyone and everything considered scientific research? 

It most certainly is not, Mr. Jeffrey Beall. 

Could it be, however, an applied money-making project for you and your university, Mr. Jeffrey Beall? 

 (By the way, why should a small publishing house from some place in India, which cannot attract papers, nor editorial board members, from western universities, be in your black list Mr. Jeffrey Beall? In this case, you should also black list all non-US and non-European universities. Of course there exist first-rate universities, like Harvard, MIT, Berkeley, Cambridge. Should all other universities be in a black list? Is this your logic “Professor” Beall? Furthermore, you condemn any new publishing house, as it is natural for them to not have papers and not be indexed as soon as they launch, but has to deal with you, who, like a vulture, immediately includes them in your black list for those reasons.) 

I would greatly appreciate your response, Mr. Jeffrey Beal. And I would also appreciate feedback from anyone who agrees with me. 

My aim is to create a network of true scientists and expose “Professor”, “Academic Teacher” and, above all, “Researcher” Jeffrey Beall (this science jack-of-all-trades, who doesn’t know a first-degree algebraic equation, derivatives, integrals, elementary Physics and Chemistry laws, etc) 
Thank you 

Tuesday, 22 October 2013


Fake IEEE Conferences


We found by Google 2 more collections of IEEE Fake, Predatory, Bogus Conferences:

http://iacsit.org/pub09.htm

http://iacsit.org/pub08.htm

Draw your own conclusions.

b)  Another excellent report:  Do the IEEE Fellows organize Fake Conferences? Fake Conference is inviting scholars to send the rejected papers from the other conferences.
If an IEEE Fellow organizes Fake and Bogus conferences, IEEE must retract the IEEE Fellowship from him,
otherwise IEEE is Fake and Bogus itself. (We know that is.)

Friday, 4 October 2013


New Junk IEEE Conference. New Fake IEEE Conference. Why aren''t these conferences in Jeffrey Beall' list?

Searching by google for new Junk IEEE Conferences, Fake IEEE Conferences we found this interesting case: AMERICAN COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, IEEE Sponsored Conference.
http://www.americancse.org/events/csci2014/publication
The conference is listesd in IEEE Official Site as IEEE Conference.

Send email to IEEE informing them about this fake conference: cpspublishing@computer.org

What's wrong with this conference?
a) The main problem for this conference is that this is supposed to organized by ... "AMERICAN COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND EDUCATION".
There is not any AMERICAN COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND EDUCATION and obviously this is a counterfeit, spurious institute, a money making machine for IEEE Officers. This is a made up, mock institute.

b) This bogus IEEE Conference is without Chairman, without International Program committee and of course we do not know who is the real organizer, since the ... "AMERICAN COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND EDUCATION" is a scam.

We recommend to inform your colleagues about this IEEE Fraud and about this IEEE mock conference. Do not serve in the committee of this conference, if they invite you later. We also recommend against publications to this bogus anti-academic pseudoconference.


Send email to IEEE informing them about this fake conference: cpspublishing@computer.org